doubleucasino™vegasslots| People's Daily: What is the purpose of hyping up China's new energy "overcapacity"

Recently, there has been a lack of factual evidenceDoubleucasino ™vegasslotsUnder the circumstances, the United States has tried its best to play up the so-called "overcapacity" argument of China's new energy, causing some countries to follow suit. The real purpose of doing so can be said to be obvious to the public.

The biggest attempt to hype China's new energy "overcapacity" is to contain and suppress China's dominant industries. The United States has regarded China as its toughest strategic competitor. In the economic field, the United States is trying to suppress China's high-tech industries and strategic emerging industries. The new energy industry is related to the green and low-carbon transformation and future development, and is bound to become the focus of American competition and containment against China. In recent years, China's new energy industry has developed vigorously. The "new three" products, represented by new energy vehicles, lithium batteries and photovoltaic products, sell well all over the world, forming a certain international competitive advantage by virtue of technological innovation, production efficiency and excellent quality. During this year's Canton Fair, some European and American import buyers said that the whole world is interested in China's green technology. China is the global leader in the field of new energy vehicles and hopes to purchase more new energy vehicle products here. At the beginning of this year, journalist and writer Henry Sanderson wrote an article in the US Foreign Affairs magazine that the West lags far behind China in the new energy industry, and now China is in the forefront not only in production and application, but also in technological innovation. Bloomberg reported on April 2, citing the views of several experts, that the success of China's new energy industry is mainly due to technological innovation, good infrastructure, complete domestic industrial chain, low factor cost and other factors. from the export price, capacity utilization, inventory and other aspects, China's new energy vehicles do not have the problem of overcapacity. Among them, the capacity utilization rates of the new energy vehicle companies with the largest exports are all above 80%. The US Government turns a blind eye to these facts, maliciously hypes the argument of "overcapacity" of China's new energy, distorts and criticizes China's industrial policy, generalizes the concept of national security, and attempts to join allies and partners to promote decoupling and disconnection of China's new energy industry. the real purpose behind it is to curb and suppress the development of China's advanced manufacturing and new energy industries through unfair non-market means.

The important intention of hype China's new energy "overcapacity" is to support the development of American local industry. Since the 1970s, the traditional manufacturing in the United States has accelerated the transfer to lower-cost developing countries, resulting in the hollowing out of manufacturing. The proportion of manufacturing value added to US GDP has increased from 22% in 1970.Doubleucasino ™vegasslots.7% fell to 10.3% in 2022, and the proportion of manufacturing employment in total non-farm employment fell from 24.5% to 8.4%. The 2008 international financial crisis revealed the harm of the economy from reality to emptiness. Since then, the US government began to implement the strategy of re-industrialization and vigorously promote the return of manufacturing and the development of local industries. In the field of new energy, due to the differences in governing ideas, the American democratic and Republican governments vacillate and vacillate between safeguarding the interests of traditional energy and promoting the development of clean energy, and the policy "pendulum effect" hinders the development of the new energy industry. First, it actively participated in the conclusion of the Paris Agreement on international climate governance and climate change, and vigorously developed clean energy technology, and then announced its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change, tilting its energy policy towards the traditional fossil energy industry. recently, the climate and energy policy of the United States has made another major adjustment, introducing the "inflation reduction Act" to subsidize new energy vehicles, charging piles, photovoltaic equipment and other industries as high as 369 billion US dollars. As a result of such repeated twists and turns, many new energy companies in the United States are at a loss as to what to do and miss an important opportunity for industrial development. In this context, the United States concocts the argument of "overcapacity" of new energy in China in the final analysis to strive for more time and space for the development of the local new energy industry in the United States.

The hype of China's new energy "overcapacity" is also to serve the domestic political needs of the United States. At present, the United States is full of economic and social contradictions. Under the circumstances of increasing anxiety and fear about China's continued development and growth in the United States, taking China as a "scapegoat", transferring contradictions to the outside world, and throwing the pot at Hua Shiqiang has become a correct natural choice for US domestic politics. This is an election year in the United States, and the final outcome of the election will depend on the election situation of a few key swing states. According to the latest poll on the US "True and clear Politics" website, democratic and Republican candidates have support rates of about 45% in six key swing states, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin and Nevada, and the competition is extremely tight. The traditional industries such as iron and steel, fuel vehicles and new energy industries such as new energy vehicles, lithium batteries and photovoltaic are precisely the important pillars to support the economic growth, employment and livelihood of the above-mentioned key swing states. Whether it is the steel industry in Pennsylvania, the fuel vehicle industry in Michigan, the photovoltaic industry in Georgia and Arizona, the new energy vehicle industry in Wisconsin, and the battery industry in Nevada, all face the pressure of international competition, including China. At this time, throwing out the argument of "overcapacity" of China's new energy is an important strategy that US election candidates need to adopt in order to win the election and cater to voters and stakeholders in key swing states.

Out of domestic economic and political needs and ignoring market laws and international rules, the United States exaggerates China's new energy "overcapacity", which is a new excuse against economic globalization, protectionism and unilateralism. A few other countries blindly follow the trend out of their own short-term interests. This is not good for China, not good for the United States, not good for relevant countries, and bad for the whole world. Curbing and suppressing the development of China's new energy industry will not make the American local industry strong, on the contrary, it will distort the international market and damage the efficiency of resource allocation. History has repeatedly proved that unilateralism and protectionism will only benefit others at the end of the day. Green and low-carbon transformation and tackling climate change are common challenges facing the international community. The development of China's new energy industry conforms to the general trend of future development and will help countries around the world to implement the United Nations 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development and the goals of the Paris Agreement on Climate change. It is hoped that the United States and a small number of other countries will stand at the height of a community with a shared future for mankind, proceed from the fundamental well-being of their own people and the people of the world, adhere to the principles of multilateralism and free trade, and strengthen cooperation with China in the field of new energy. join hands to meet common global challenges.